MediaIran Rejects Quick 45-Day Ceasefire, Wants Terms for Lasting End
By Reuters | 06 Apr, 2026
Iran's response contained 10 clauses including a safe Strait passage protocol, lifting of sanctions and reconstruction reparations.
A man wearing a high-visibility vest carries a child's bicycle at an impact site, following a barrage of missiles launched from Iran, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in central Israel, April 6, 2026. REUTERS/Nir Elias
The U.S. and Iran on Monday weighed a framework plan to end their five‑week-old conflict, as Tehran said it wanted a lasting end to the war and pushed back against pressure to swiftly reopen the Strait of Hormuz under a temporary ceasefire.
Iran conveyed its response to the U.S. proposal for ending the war to Pakistan, rejecting a ceasefire and emphasizing the necessity of a permanent end to the war, the official IRNA news agency said on Monday.
The Iranian response consisted of 10 clauses, including an end to conflicts in the region, a protocol for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, lifting of sanctions, and reconstruction, the agency added.
Trump has threatened to rain "hell" on Tehran if it did not make a deal by 8 p.m. EDT (0000 GMT) Tuesday that would allow traffic to start moving again through the vital route for global energy supplies.
(Reporting by Reuters bureaux worldwide; Writing by Charlie Devereux and David Morgan; Editing by Toby Chopra, William Maclean)
Recent Articles
- The 4th Time May Be a Charm for the 'New' Keiko Fujimori
- Global Smartphone Market Faces Record Annual Decline as Chip Crunch Worsens
- Tata Taps Chery Technology for Avinya Premium EV Push
- Imminent Strong El Nino Impact Likely Worsened by Climate Change
- DeepSeek Slated to Raise $7 Billion in Maiden Funding Round
- ChatGPT App Hits 1 Billion Monthly Active Users in Record Time
- World Cup Could Cost Employers as Workers Tune into Matches
- Vietnam's May Trade Deficit Widens to Record High
- Taiwan, South Korea Stocks Get Goldman Upgrade As Asia Rally Intensifies
- Where'd the Mike Go?
