Asian American Daily

Subscribe

Subscribe Now to receive Goldsea updates!

  • Subscribe for updates on Goldsea: Asian American Daily
Subscribe Now

What Do You Call a President Who Never Learns from His Mistakes?
By Tom Kagy | 05 Apr, 2026

Donald Trump sets himself up for another debacle by issuing yet another ultimatum to a Tehran regime that has made it abundantly clear that it doesn't bow to threats.

(Image by ChatGPT)

Masochist? Fool? Donald Trump? 

Any of those would work.  After having already delivered several ultimata to a proud regime that's all too well dug in against US air power, a regime that knows that sending in ground troops would merely dim the plight of the West and of Trump himself—a man getting buried in negative poll numbers and press coverage—Trump shows again that he's a one-trick pony headed ever closer to the point of no return without a face-saving exit.

A Seasoned Enemy

The Islamic Republic has been absorbing external pressure since 1979. It survived a ruinous eight-year war with Iraq, decades of sanctions, multiple rounds of "maximum pressure," the assassination of its top military commander, and more cyber sabotage than most nations could dream up. And through all of it, the mullahs are still there, still standing, still defiant.  Anyone keeping score would have to admit that Iran is pretty good at this game.

So what does Trump do?  He goes on some social media site and rattles the saber yet again by giving a 48-hour ultimatum.  It's the geopolitical equivalent of threatening to ground a teenager who moved out months ago.  

Ultimata only work when the other side believes you and that you can actually hurt it more than yourself. The Iranians remember 2018, when Trump blew up the nuclear deal and promised that a new, better deal was just around the corner. That corner never came. They remember the snapback of sanctions that were supposed to bring Tehran to its knees within months. Tehran is still standing proudly.  They watched Trump bluster about North Korea, do a little diplomatic dance with Kim Jong Un, and then walk away with absolutely nothing to show for it. 

Only Bad Options

What are Trump's actual options here?  A surgical strike of the kind he loves to gloat over?  Iran has spent decades hardening and dispersing its arsenal across hundreds of underground facilities precisely in anticipation of this kind of threat.   Even the most optimistic military planners will tell you, off the record, that airstrikes would cost the US a couple orders of magnitude more in ordinance than the  military damage it would inflict on Iran's arsenal.  

All it would achieve would be to enrage a population and expand Iranian attacks against US regional bases and allies, and spike oil prices even further to the great distress of our friends and allies, not to mention Americans back home. 

Ground troops?  The American public has zero appetite for another Mideast land war, and Trump knows it.  So does the Tehran regime.  Trump's 2016 and 2020 pitches were built on "we don't do stupid wars anymore."  Invading Iran, a country of 90 million people with a motivated military and significant asymmetric capabilities, would make Iraq look like a warm-up act.  Trump knows he can't worsen midterm prospects without risking impeachment and, quite likely, criminal conviction.

Deadlines and Eye Rolls

So Trump is left with his deadlines and ultimata turning into dust again, while Tehran and most of the world shakes its head and rolls its eyes. 

His silly bluster is only dimming his prospects of anything resembling a successful outcome.  Every ultimatum that passes without significant consequence teaches the Iranians—and the Russians, Chinese and North Koreans—that the US is saddled with a leader Americans are getting increasingly desperate to shed.  It hollows out American credibility in a way that takes decades to rebuild. 

Sinking at Home

Meanwhile, back at home, Trump is listing and sinking badly, with ugly poll numbers, brutal press coverage and a domestic agenda tangled up in losing court fights and congressional gridlock. 

Of course that's one cause of the problem.  When a president is struggling that badly at home, he tends to look for a foreign policy win that will rally the base.  Iran is not that.  It's a place where desperate presidents go to have their support slowly ground down.

If Trump were a thinking man, he would have learned from his miscalculation and maneuvered toward one of several available diplomatic off-ramps that Tehran and international middlemen have offered. 

Lose the Threats, Get Smart

Iran has never been monolithic, and still isn't, despite Trump's best efforts to rally the entire nation against the US.  Factions within the regime are reasonable enough to prefer economic relief and engagement over perpetual isolation.  A serious diplomatic strategy would find those factions and give them something to work with, something they can actually sell to the Iranian people.  Instead, Trump's approach  consistently strengthens the most desperate hardliners, who point to every ultimatum as proof that America can't be trusted and will never negotiate in good faith.

The definition of insanity, as the saying goes, is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.  Trump has now issued enough ultimata to Iran to fill a small book.  Not one of them has produced the desired outcome.  Instead each has made the regime sneer a bit more boldly.

So what do you call a president who never learns from his mistakes?  A second-term president speeding toward the same wall he hit before.  This time the crash is likely to be far more painful.